11.9.09
Cricket Movie Review: 9 (Also Up and District 9)
1) I like sci-fi.
2) In addition liking sci-fi, I like the specific niches of dystopian and post-apocalypse sci-fi.
3) I'm a fan of (good) animation, and this certainly didn't look disappointing in that regard.
4) The character designs seemed interesting.
5) A really, really well-put-together trailer is usually a good sign.
So, I wasn't expecting anything earth-shaking--just a good, quality, for-a-slightly-older-audience piece of post-apocalyptic animation.
I'm going to be pretty frank and brief, because I haven't been keeping up on my movie reviews.
22.8.09
Sunday Comics: Calvin and Hobbes
I regret my recent inconsistencies with the “Sunday Comics” feature, which were for a long time the one consistent feature of this blog at all. I think what I need to do is inject a little change into it, as has been evident in all the recent sort of “special” Sunday Comicses that have occurred, to keep things interesting both for myself as the writer and for you as the readers. Henceforth, “Sunday Comics” on OverReactor will no longer simply be “spotlightings” of great examples of comicdom. It will be, more broadly, a weekly post on just about anything so long as it deals with comics. The “spotlightings” of the sort that have made up the last twenty-something entries will still provide the bulk of the content, I’m sure, but this way I can provide myself with more flexibility while still working in the same basic theme. For this particular one, I’d like to revisit the classic comic strip Calvin and Hobbes and yap about that a bit in a sort of impromptu, brief, meandering essay.
Comic strips have long been a part of me, and were a large contributor to my eventual, present-day love of the comics form in general. They’ve been there for such a long time in my memory, and are still even to my adult mind one of the best things about newspapers. Historically, they are the direct parents of the comic book, at least in
But that lack of change also breeds familiarity, which breeds comfort and habit. I enthusiastically read the comics as a kid and though I no longer read them every morning, I still feel like some small extra bonus has been added to my morning routine when I do stop to explore these little four-panel adventures over my cereal. For a good stretch of time, roughly from fourth grade to about tenth, I thought I myself might want to eventually join the comic strip industry. That interest eventually morphed and blossomed into my present-day desire to do a few comic book/graphic novel-format projects. Whether they’re books or strips, I still love comics.
At the forefront of my initial love of comics as a kid was Bill Watterson’s Calvin and Hobbes. Even then I could just tell there was something different about it, something that made it special. The writing appealed to what had to then be the seed of the language-geek side of me, and I know I was using some of Calvin’s words before I actually knew what they all meant (don’t nobody tell you comics ain’t no good for the vocabulary). I’ve been rereading all my old collections of the strip lately, and looking back on it with a now-adult perspective, it’s even better than ever.
Now that I can fully comprehend the dialogue, its wit becomes that much more clear, and as I’ve recently begun at last to make a greater return to practicing my drawing skills, I’ve also taken note of Watterson’s craftsmanship in his illustration—his brush-and-pen linework had a unique style even then and would only stand out more as Photoshop becomes a prominent comics ingredient. Some of his backgrounds and scenery pieces, especially in outdoor scenes, are downright pretty, and are done with few lines to boot. His Sunday strips were all sure to take advantage of the larger size and number of panels with the art and/or story. If Bill Watterson made a return to comicking I think it’d be interesting to see him try a longer work in a non-serialized format. He also preferred the humor in the writing to be character-based rather than joke-based, something I’ve grown to have a great appreciation of, in large part due to this comic strip’s reliance on it. Character-driven humor is much harder to write than situational humor, but it’s almost always better for it. Even better, he managed to be distinctly satirical most of the time while avoiding specific politics or social issues, thus keeping it widely accessible and to an extent, timeless.
All the more tragic, then, when the strip ended at the peak of a successful ten-year run. I can only vaguely remember its cancellation. These days I can only look at the books and sort of note that this used to be in a newspaper, newspapers I read as a kid. But later, upon doing more reading about Mr. Watterson, I understood why he did it, though it was a reason odd to the comic strip industry in particular—ideas of artistic integrity. Though he recognized comic strips' commercial art origins (it’s clear from reading things he’s written that the man knows his comics history), he grew to view Calvin and Hobbes as more of an art project. The more his syndicate pressured him to license the strip due to its immense popularity, the less he liked the idea of it, and he fought a long, long fight against merchandising that he eventually figured he could not win. At this realization, he wrote a goodbye/thank-you letter to the folks in charge. Watterson felt merchandise, while potentially worth millions with the readership he had, would have compromised the “spirit” of his strip.
I must admit that Bill Watterson and I differ slightly on this point—I would not be against some minor merchandising of any of my own creations (it would be hard to resist designing a t-shirt or two), though I am still staunchly opposed to the overmerchandising suffered by many popular cartoons: the gross excesses of the likes of Garfield and Spongebob now make me faintly ill with the sights of their faces stamped on every product imaginable, and even Charles Schulz’s classic comics pillar Peanuts loses some of its heartwarming qualities when one is confronted by a wall of greeting cards. I think the subtlety here lies in the difference between products as a means of generating support for and awareness of its parent work, and works that become products themselves. It is knowing when to say no. However, I don’t admire Watterson’s own stance on marketing any less in the light of my own perspective. I fully respect his wishes to have Calvin and Hobbes remain just a comic strip, especially given that it in fact wasn’t “just a comic strip.”
Bill Watterson made legitimate art out of a form long maligned and treated with cynicism by even its own creators. Looking back at the strips now, as I have recently done, I can see that art so clearly. He carefully chose his colors and palettes, and the characters’ voices are all made to sound unique. In its absence, it has left many an echo on that brightly-coloured newspaper page—from the clearly-influenced art style and witticisms of Frazz to the joy of character interplay utilized in
Holden Out.
2.8.09
Sunday Comics: Safe Area Gorazde

By: Joe Sacco
Holden Out.
26.7.09
Another very special Sunday Comics: The fall of Penny & Aggie
Some of you may remember way back in only my third-ever Sunday Comics when I spotlighted a little bit of awesomeness called Penny & Aggie. It was shiny goodness, a sort of modern-day, more-complex Archie, and I read it with joy and comfort, savoring especially the well-done characterization and layered character-building. This thing lived on how its characters were written.
Sadly, it has now been long enough that I think I can declare this wonderfullity no more.
It began fairly early this year--P&A wrapped up its longest, most serious, most story-impacting arc ever, called "The Popsicle War." It was well-staged, necessary to the large undercurrent plot, and changed the very nature of several key character relationships. Very soon after the "Popsicle War" arc had wrapped up (satisfyingly but still on some small "what now?" cliffhangers regarding characters who got the short end of the stick), it was announced that after five years, Giselle Lagace, their artist, was leaving the comic to work on some other comics/art projects. Though Giselle did good work, I wasn't initially too concerned--after all, the art was strong, but the comic's bigger strength had always been its writing. The new artist, whose name currently eludes me, actually draws fairly similarly to Giselle--the difference is there, but isn't jarring. So it seemed like things would continue more or less as normal.
I and a couple of friends who also read it quickly started to notice that the writing was feeling a bit off with the new artist. I shrugged it off--it's not like the comic was ever flawless, there was certainly the odd page here or there that fell a little flatter than others. Perhaps T. Campbell was simply having an off day, or as it were, off several days. Maybe Giselle was missed to an extent that it was briefly affecting the writing.
A few months later, I think I can say that whatever it is, Penny & Aggie has not been the same comic since that last arc finished, and the transition was sudden. The characters are caricatures of themselves, some, for no reason, even acting bluntly out of character. Characters revealing motivations and thinking has become clunky and as subtle as a train. Characters we should be checking up on have been ignored completely.
I do not write this to retract or rescind my spotlight--no no, at the time I did so it was a wonderful comic, and I will remember it for that. I write simply to ask what went wrong. To note. To, in a sense, warn.
I don't know what happened, but it's upsetting. Clearly, T. Campbell and G. Lagace had chemistry together...let's hope that they realize this as well...perhaps it's not silly to wonder if she might come back. Perhaps this is simply a bad new arc we find ourselves in for whatever reason. Or perhaps Penny & Aggie ended with The Popsicle War.
~Holden Out.
18.7.09
Series Review: 2003-2005 Prince of Persia Trilogy
Perhaps I should start a touch earlier, though.
A warning before you continue: this is long. You who know me know I often write at length. Beware!
6.7.09
Sunday Comics Indie Compilation Triple Play: VOID Pulpo: Citric ESP
Welcome to the third and final round of the Indie Comics Compilation Triple Play on what is actually yet again a Monday. Maybe I should just rename this feature, my Sundays lately seem to find me without a comfortable time to blog. Ha, I kid. We'll get back on track eventually. Anyway, today's compilation is similar to the first one I featured, Fat Chunk, in that it's rooted in a larger overall comics-related project. It differs, however, in that the compilation itself is not the primary project it stems from.
By: EnterVOID.com. Yes, the author is given as the website itself.
And that concludes the Indie Comics Compilation Triple Play, whee. I've got a game review planned fairly soon, so until then.
Holden Out.
29.6.09
Sunday Comics Indie Compilation Triple Play: I Saw You

Welcome to the second round of the Sunday (today, technically Monday...I was gone most of yesterday) Comics Indie Compilation Triple Play. Today's Entry, I Saw You, is especially interesting given its creation process. Let's jump in.
By: Edited by Julia Wertz, contains entries by her and several, several others.
Holden Out.
22.6.09
Some Doodles: Lexa and Natasha
These last couple quarters, my doodles were more scarce, but I noticed a definite theme popping up--two certain characters of mine, both belonging to the same comics plotline (working title "Silicon Heart"). One makes sense, as she's the main character, the other was a bit of a surprise to find I was sketching her so frequently, as she's a very minor character (though perhaps it's the thrill of newness--she was thought up just this year).
So, anyway. Doodle showcase.

June's Magnetic Poem
Has only a green heart
Every lifetime
Please Relax.
No idea what this one means, but isn't that usually the case? 'sides, I like it.
Holden Out.
21.6.09
Sunday Comics Indie Compilation Triple Play: Fat Chunk

Welcome to Sunday Comics' special Indie Compilation Triple Play, a three-Sunday event where I'll highlight a lovely trio of comic-bit sandwiches. I've noticed this sort of thing slowly popping up, maybe developing into a delightful trend--little volumes of mostly unknown comickers putting short works together in an effort to simply get their work out there. Today we'll take a look at Fat Chunk, a project of sorts dedicated to exactly this.
By: Put together by British awesomeface Jamie Smart, but there's over 80 artists who put stuff into this first volume alone.
The second volume, themed around Zombies, is slated to hit shelves at the end of this month.
Holden Out.
14.6.09
Sunday Comics: Homestuck

URL: www.mspaintadventures.com
By: Andrew Hussie
Holden Out.
1.6.09
Sunday Comics: Special Comics Theory Edition!
Two Sundays in a row with different-than-usual Sunday Comics posts? Including one that is being written on what is technically no longer Sunday? And is written in a different format than usual?
Why yes.
A bit about today's entry, first. Yes, there really is such a thing as Comics Theory. While not frequently regarded as such (often, debatably, for very good reasons), comics are--or at least have the definite potential to be--a legit art form. It's a vehicle of expression that has certain properties unique to it. Nowhere else except in film is there such a seamless blend of the verbal and the visual, ideally both working to support the other (except in wordless comics, though those have language in their own right). And even then, despite the parallels, comics can be very much set apart from film with more of their own conventions--how they handle and manipulate time or the effects of panel shape, size, and placement, just to name a couple. There's a whole science, process, and language that can be diseccted from them. And there have been books written. Books that I myself have studied, and now hold up here as good examples. Okay, technically a couple of them aren't comics theory books, they're comics history books, but I figured I'd lump them in too. Off we go! (Trigger comics-esque "Woooosh!" noise)

Understanding Comics by Scott McCloud
30.5.09
Commercial Art! Of A Sort.
Anyway, I was recently involved in a group that was making a magazine (yes, a real one, though as it's still technically a school project there will only ever be the one issue we've made available for purchase/in existence). Though each member of the team contributed an equal amount of article content, we also had our specialties--I was our illustrator, as it were. I've decided to post my favourite images here, for display and kicks.

21.5.09
Holden's Mega Game Demo-Thon
So a couple nights ago, being that I am in the use of that wonderful game delivery service known as Steam, I decided to take advantage of a lot of the free demos floating around it. A lot of them. So many that, about halfway through checking them out, I thought, "hey! I could make a blog post out of this!" Why not, right? Here go. To make this entry even lengthier, I'll include check-outs of a few free demos I took a look at long before and a couple of totally free, complete games I've handled in the past few months. Let's go in alphabetical order, shall we?
10.5.09
Sunday Comics: Ghost World

By: Daniel Clowes
Holden Out.
3.5.09
Sunday Comics: Concrete

By: Paul Chadwick
Holden Out.
My Cell Phone Lives A Couple Centuries Back.
Noticed something interesting about my cell a couple days ago.
If you're not familiar with T9Word, it's a texting program that's fairly common on a lot of cell phones these days, or at least some variant of it, designed to make typing on a phone without a full keyboard a little bit easier. And it does do that, most of the time. It takes guesses at what you're typing as you type it so you don't have to make as many button presses.
But it also does this by having a sort of bank of common words, and when two different words occupy the exact same numeric space, it will guess the more common word.
I was asking someone about borrowing a plate of theirs, but T9 didn't recognize "plate."
It put in "slave."
...When has "slave" been a more commonly used word than "plate?" I realize slavery still exists, yes, but it's not exactly part of casual speech any more, and seems especially out-of-place in that regard for a program that accepts "dude" as a recognized word. I mean, think about it. There are really only three contexts "slave" is used in outside the taboo subject of real, present-day slavery, none of which seem like they'd be part of your average texting conversation:
1) in a historical context
2) in an S&M context
3) as a fairly uncommon verb meaning "to do something in a slavelike manner," i.e. "I've been slaving away all day on this."
Four uses, possibly, if you include Jimmy O'Teen's whining that having to trim the front yard hedges is slave treatment. But...more common than "plate?" Really?
Thanks for giving me that day's eyebrow-raise, T9Word.
Holden Out.
Happy Belated Free Comic Book Day.
So yesterday was Free Comic Book Day, which to my knowledge currently just exists in the US and the UK (someone please correct me if I'm wrong). On this day (the first Saturday in May), participating comic shops set aside a small portion of books as giveaways. Some publishers even produce special Free Comic Book Day books just for this occasion! So mark your calendars, panel-lovers.
Holden Out.
Cricket Cola: Another Shameless Plug

DRINK IT.
I jest. But it is good stuff. As several people who know me out there in the real world know, I have a bit of a thing for crickets, so there was a delighted grin when I first discovered this soda. It sorta became my little personal official beverage for a while.
Then it promptly disappeared for a couple years.
Now, it appears to be back (though still is probably kind of hard-to-find...was even back in the day). Tres woot.
It's supposed to be a blend of green tea and cola, though the green tea is fairly subtle. It's more like a very, very lightly carbonated cola with some green tea-ish notes to it. It's also a good stay-awake drink, since the combined efforts of the cola and tea give it a massive kick of caffeine.
Go give it a try. It's only like a buck a bottle, so you don't have much to lose (except sleep).
Holden Out.
May's Magnetic Poem
And a haiku.
Sing, little waffle
Celebrate your birthday, too
Say what pleases you.
Holden Out.
Yogu-San is Awesome.
I don't think what I'm about to do violates any of this, because I'm not being paid or in any way coerced to do this. I'm just going to spotlight something I think rocks. I am going to give a place free advertising, which I think is the best advertising. Advertising generated by consumers for consumers because they honestly like a product. (This sort of entry is going to happen at least once more, so I've given it its own category, tongue-in-cheekedly labeled "Selling Out")
Long, rambling self-indulgent punkish-facade preamble now over, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you...
Yogu-San.

Did you just hear a popping sound? That was the cuteness center of your brain exploding. This little dude is the mascot for which they are named. Squishy, swirly little Yogu-San himself. Or...itself. Whatever.
So what is Yogu-San? Yogu-San, dear friends, is a frozen yogurt place, in a similar vein as such places as PinkBerry and Red Mango...three flavour choices and a variety of toppings. And sweet Aunt Wendy's eyeballs, is it good. (My apologies to anyone who has an Aunt Wendy, I did not mean to desecrate her eyes.)
The available toppings range from the expected (crushed Oreos, chocolate chips, various types of fresh fruit) to the quirky and fun (Pocky, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Fruity Pebbles). The two "set" flavours are Original and Green Tea, with a third flavour that rotates/changes each month. As if Yogu-San himself wasn't cute enough, they also apply the "-san" honorific to their flavours, as though they're Yogu-San's relatives or something...Green Tea-San, Mango-San, etc. It's precious.
The yogurt itself I found to be awesomely delicious, though it might not be what you expect from frozen yogurt, necessarily--for one, it has a notably stronger "yogurty" flavour, rather than just being like soft-serve ice cream, and two, the texture is different from samesaid soft-serveish fro-yo, being sort of like snow. It breaks off in your mouth in chunks and quickly melts across your tongue.
Oh, and did I mention the workers have a genuine-feeling air of friendliness?
Yogu-San is located in the Bellis Fair Mall in Bellingham, Washington. If you ever find yourself there, seriously check it out.
Eesh, even the name is fun to say. Yogu-saaaaaaaaaaaaan.
Holden Out. (of yogurt)
My Local Grocery Store Sucks.
Near where I currently reside is a grocery store, part of a chain called Haggen. There's lots of whining about how steep their prices are, yet they are still bought from readily because of their ridiculously convenient location. Today, though, I found out just how much they're ripping me and other people that live near and with me off.
Let's compare grocery lists and prices, shall we?
First, the list from when I made what I now call "FailDogs" (Homemade corn dogs that looked hideous and were a pain to make but actually tasted pretty darn good). These I got at Haggen. It's mostly raw ingredients (which are by nature usually cheaper than premade mixtures/prepared stuff). It should also be noted that I went for small sizes on these since I didn't need a lot, and cheap brands.
- 1 box cornmeal
- 1 box sugar
- 1 ...thing...baking powder
- 1 pack sausages
- 1 pack skewers
- 1 cheap plastic bowl
- 1 box baking soda
- 1 mid-size bottle vegetable oil
- 1 tiny carton of buttermilk
- 1 box butter
Total price: FIFTY-FIVE DOLLARS.
I'm trying to convince myself there was more on that reciept, but no, that was seriously it. ...Why I still paid that, especially knowing full well I couldn't really afford it, is an even greater mystery.
Now, let's look at the grocery shopping I did today at the local Trader Joe's. It's more out of the way than Haggen, for sure, but...ai yai.
I would also like to thank Starlight, who proved herself to be the best shopping assistant ever. Kept me on-track, focused, thinking, moving efficiently, prioritizing and even was kind enough to provide a running price tally (I had a fifty-dollar gift card that was a Christmas present to work with).
The list from today's TJ's grocery adventure:
- 1 pack roast beef
- 1 pack pepperjack cheese
- 1 tub boursin
- 1 good-sized cucumber
- 1 pack salami
- 1 loaf oat/wheat bread
- 1 box squash soup
- 2 little things of yogurt
- half-gallon of milk
- 1 tub tapioca pudding
- 1 bag veggie chips
- 1 box granola bars
- 2 box crackers
- 1 bar good dark chocolate
- 2 box mochi
- 1 bag tortilla chips
- 1 jar salsa
- 1 bag snap pea crisps
Total Price: 48 dollars. Didn't even use all of the gift card, and the things bought can easily mix for and stretch across multiple meals and snacks, as opposed to eight corndogs.
What are you even thinking, Haggen.
Though there are plenty of individual items there that can be cried foul on too. They have a little lunch pack thing of six smallish chicken strips with a little tub of ranch. ...For eight dollars. Eight bloody dollars? I could go down to Dairy Queen and get the same thing with a drink, fries, and toast and it would still be less. Even the apples at Haggen are like a buck each, as opposed to a lot of other places (a lot, not all) hovering around fifty cents each.
Eff you, Haggen.
Holden Out.
26.4.09
Sunday Comics: Pictures For Sad Children

URL: www.picturesforsadchildren.com
By: John Campbell
Holden Out.
19.4.09
Sunday Comics: Black Jack

By: Osamu Tezuka
Holden Out.
14.4.09
About to get all Religious Iconography up in yo grill.
"A large sculpture of Christ on the cross was removed from outside a church in West Sussex, England, after its vicar said it was 'scaring young children.' The Reverend Ewen Souter said the 10-foot crucifix, which was designed in the 1960s and made out of coal dust and resin, was 'a horrifying depiction of pain and suffering.' The sculpture, previously located on the side of St. John's Church in Broadbridge, has now been given to Horsham Museum. It will be replaced with a new stainless steel cross. In a survey carried out by the church, every comment about the sculpture was negative."
...Wow. Just...wow.
Really?
Really, now.
You took it down because it was scaring children and was a "horrifying depiction of pain and suffering?" That's funny, because I always thought the pain and suffering was, oh, I don't know, part of the point. And after keeping it up there for almost fifty years, no less. (cue a big fat sigh)
I realize that religious iconography is a tricky thing, because any symbol has potential to become just an image, and override its own meaning through that. I think it's sort of neat sometimes that some religions put strict limits on their iconography--Muslims, for example, forbidding visual depiction of Mohammad to avoid idolatry. Because a lot of times it seems like the cross, like here in this example, can become just a picture, just a symbol that stands for something generic, like a company logo, rather than a reminder of one of history's most brutal execution methods and the most recognized person who suffered under it, for a supernatural, selfless, and sacred purpose. The crucifixion was not a happy affair. There was screaming and death and blood and mutilation and all sorts of unpleasant things going on with pressure in wrist tendons because there's a railroad spike going through your wrist. My own wrists ache just typing it.
Stainless steel? If you're using that as a metaphor for the purity that comes with the aftermath of the crucifixion, then fine, but somehow I get that's not what the intent was here. Jesus' kindness and gentleness is well-documented, yes, but it seems like more and more places of worship are focusing just on that, just on the Bible's warm fuzzy moments and watering down moments like Christ's death because it's "too violent" or "frightening to kids." The Bible is not a warm, fuzzy bedtime story full of giggles and snuggles. Oh, of course there are happy moments, and peace, and hope and grace and all the wonderful things of that nature regularly celebrated about it, but when those are overemphasized, overall scope is lost and there's no longer anything to contrast those happy moments against (not that happy moments need contrast to exist--but it helps for comparison purposes). That's where we get what I call "White Jesus." You've all seen pictures of him--sitting there like a Renaissance portrait, sometimes holding a little lambkin, usually for some reason looking up and off to the left and very aloof, white as cottage cheese despite his Mediterranian origins (not that is race is actually that important to his identity, but I'm riding the stereotype train all the way to Example Station, so choo choo). This is the same guy who, when mounted up on a cross, only looks vaguely uncomfortable, if even that. A lot of this stems from the Rennaisance, since I mention it, and times where it would have been thought of as somehow sacriligious to portray Christ as anything but this stoic statue of a guy, to recognize his holiness. That's great and all, but to also ignore his humanity--the fact that he was fully capable of experiencing pain and suffering and did--detracts a lot from his overall significance within Christan doctrine.
So, St. John's Church of Broadbridge, I hope you're happy with your shiny metal logo-cross. Passerby will look up at it and go, "wow, that sure is a church." Perish forbid they discomfort people or stir up any trouble, goodness no.
Holden Out, and making a weird dissatisfied face
PS: Regarding categories...what even should constitute the difference between a piece labeled "Editorial" and an "Overreacting" piece? Should I just lump them together into one category?